Quickly search for pre-existing components in your own custom design library, then simply drag and drop them into your new designs.
#Ironcad vs solidworks full
I learn pretty quickly, and if I'm gonna use CAD I want to use a platform that is full featured, so I won't outgrow it. SolidWorks Enterprise PDM: IronCAD: Design Reuse: Leverage your successful designs to create compelling proposals for new ones. I've experimented with Synchronous Tech and it makes sense to me. I'm trying Solid Edge now, and I like it better than than F360 and Onshape, but the mouse driven UI is a little cumbersome. It has a strong user community and will do pretty much all the same things as Inventor/SolidWorks/Rhino/Etc. My research into Solid Edge shows it has a decent market share and uses a fairly typical workflow. I understand the power and logic of creating parametric designs, but I've already run into situations where the process has made changing things difficult.įrom what I've been able to determine, Solid Edge and IronCAD have stronger direct editing features which provide many of the benefits of parametric modeling without the restrictions. I've been through some tutorials for Fusion 360 and OnShape and decided I didn't like them. Everybody is kinda doing their own CAD thing. There also isn't anybody who could train or mentor me on CAD through the makerspace. DesignSpark/OnShape/Fusion 360/SolidWorks are all used and touted as the answer. There isn't one CAD platform that is popular at our makerspace. I'll probably do some 3D printing and I'd like to design bicycles and other simple contraptions. I'm a maker and I want mostly to cut stuff out using the CNC router, laser, and plasma cutters at the makerspace I've joined. Any input is appreciated.You've both hit on my concerns, u/Mjothnitvir and u/SeaworthyKaiser. Internet speed here in Australia is shxxxt.Īnyway thanks for anyone who can help me. I hate cloud-based stuff (Fusion360/Onshape). (4) Is IronCAD a cloud-based software? Again I would not buy it if it is. (3) Is IronCAD a subscription-based software? I would not buy it if it is. Design can be a time consuming process involving many considerations. I dont particularly care for speed comparisons of CAD systems. Most are Pro/e clones and virtually work identically except for a few small differences. I definitely want a full package in case I need some of the features in the future. Rarely do you see a comparison of CAD programs. (2) Is the "Design Collaboration Suite" a full version? I know there are some different IronCAD versions (Inovate, Draft and Compose) and each has it's own limitations. Not a superduper machine but good enough for most of my work. I use a Microsoft Surface Book 2 laptop now with the nVidia 1060 graphic card as a main CAD PC. Is there any critical improvement during these 3 years that I really need to pursue, or will I be ok with the 2016 one? Some fancy new features might be handy but I don't need them if I'm not ganna use them. (1) How do you compare the IronCAD 2016 with the new IronCAD 2019? I know a 3-yr difference will not be small, but for a normal user I care more about the stability, graphic efficiency and user experience in daily-life functionalities. I found a online dealer selling IronCAD Design Collaboration Suite 2016 for only USD $499 which is really a good deal to me. After some research I found IronCAD might be a good alternative.īut the IronCAD 2019 version is still too expensive to afford (around AUD $6500). Most of the designers around me here in Australia use Solidworks but it's way too expensive to me. I always want to learn another parametric, mechanics-oriented CAD software. I'm a 12-yr 3D designer and my mail tools are Spaceclaim, Solidthinking Evolve, Sketchup and ZBrush.